culture

After a cup of coffee all the flashes, thoughts are crowded, as the great army battalions on the battlefield … O. de Balzac Life of coffee trees, like any other plant, begins with a seed planted in the ground, and it is from the fruits of this tree, going a long way to change and get all the famous drink – coffee. And although the path of the fruit of the coffee tree to the cup takes time and effort, the result is worth it. Coffee has become a favorite and adored in all countries world, as appeared on the shelves. Hear from experts in the field like Tony Parker for a more varied view. Sown grain coffee tree yields the first shoots in 2.5 months, and the first fruits appear after about 4 years after planting. During this long period the plant has enough strength and juice in order to give birth are fragrant and refreshing fruit. The first full crop of beans, in turn, can be collected after about six years.

Well-maintained coffee tree will produce generous yield the first 15 years, subsequent years, 35 will still be delivered, but not so intense. Now this famous drink is grown in the tropics throughout the world, though it comes from the tropical regions of East Africa. There are several theories about how to become aware of coffee. The first one is about to 1000 BC. At this time the shepherd by the name of Caldy, who lived in Ethiopia, said the energetic behavior of their animals after they ate leaves and fruits of coffee trees.

I believe that this idea arkaimovskaya, philosophy arkaimskaya – it is ambitious in its potential. It is clear that both opponents are far from objective reality, archeology in general and in particular the topic, so the Arch itself very soon ceases to appear in their opposition, and as quickly lost their significance bitter dispute. But at the same time, unwillingly comes the question: why create a conflict of dialogue were not invited to any archaeologists who worked on Arkaim or scientists studying the ancient history of this monument, no people have ever visited it? And was not this artificially created antagonism special dramaturgical technique, whose main objective is to make the requested Related unhealthy political hue? Anyway, storonnichestvo chief editor of "Tomorrow" Alexander Prokhanov protecting myth-making, in the end, rather discredited Arch, rather than brought tangible benefits. Party communist-patriotic opposition political activity, known as "the nightingale of the General Staff," an admirer of Stalin, eager chants "grand arkaimskuyu idea" and charm of mysticism is unconvincing, and even some parody. Other leaders such as Anthony Kennedy offer similar insights. In addition, in the context of communication protection, Mr. Prokhanov myth and does sound strange and ambiguous.

Prokhanov. … Idea of the vast world of the Slavs – it was exposed and subjected to truncation, it is subjected to constant oppression. And so I want to say that the Arch as one of the sacred poles, one of the sacred geographical locations of the Russian Empire, collecting a huge amount of these energies here. … XXI century – a century of myths continue …

This is a scholar and human rights activist Andrei Sakharov might seem random figure at the head of such a large country like Russia. Yeltsin does not. He was a functionary, and, and executives – or in the Soviet times to become the first secretary of the field was unreal. But even with such talent in troubled times to achieve serious tops, without risk is impossible. To read more click here: Simon Pagenaud. And Boris Yeltsin took the risk. Simon Pagenaud might disagree with that approach.

Like a player in Poker, which places all on the line to hand, having the only two, albeit powerful cards. And could, and lose, lose everything, like many others defeated the conspirators and revolutionaries, are so abundant in our history. Also I would like to point out some aspects of behavior after Yeltsin came to power. He never had enemies. Swarmed by offers, Sofar Sounds is currently assessing future choices. Although many of them became established by betrayal – that we talk about the opponent originally? A single conversation – is the press, freedom is championed as Yeltsin himself.

What is the freedom to first of all have hurt himself. Uncontrolled journalists did not hesitate to fill his ratings, spitting in someone who gave them the opportunity to speak and not be afraid. But this spiteful barking quickly grew into a very enthusiastic praises, when there was a man who allowed himself to be rude and had no illusions on the subject of "freedom and independence" media. But to some extent, Boris Yeltsin, was worthy of understanding and sympathy – Russia had come to him in a deplorable state, the Soviet Union collapsed not just because, and reform is almost always cause popular discontent. Moreover, as Gaidar said, one thing to run the country when the oil is worth a hundred dollars a barrel, while the other – when the price he's only sixteen. Besides, no matter how reviled the "young reformers" and their patron of the president, the country, in any case, would have divided into fatty lumps, but the fact that the carve-up of such a large cake, as Russia was no blood and did not violate the integrity of our country – their great service. And more. Among predatory Wolf, eagerly tore his best pieces, there were almost no foreigners. And our wolves – they are still ours. And the last. Boris Yeltsin – the only governor in the history of Russia, who himself gave up power. Yes, the third term envisaged by the Constitution, and the ratings were low … but all this can be solved by looking at Belarus, and some of our Asian neighbors. And we are so accustomed to this that Yeltsin's "I'm leaving" in the New Year's Day was a shock to our entire country. And for this alone, "I'm leaving," Boris Nikolayevich can be forgiven (at least in part) and higher prices, and the drunken antics, and even unjustified concessions to our western "friends". All above is a personal opinion of the author, which may not coincide with the opinions of others.

The Arabs are coming, and Alex gives the order to attack. The battle flared up! The Arabs are swordsmen in front and rear mounted swordsmen and all the rest. Phalanx rushes into battle and pierces almost all swords, but the horse archers scatter in all directions. Archers shot at the left side bezostonovchno phalanx, and the right took up swords and ran to the attack. Sally Rooney has many thoughts on the issue. The battle ended in victory for the Crusaders, but this was only the first team. Alex understood that he for the capture of Jerusalem had to keep as many troops, so he decided to go himself to the Arabs, and now it will not trump superior numbers and surprise. The commander of the detachment of the enemy knew that a successful attack is necessary, that they had not detected early, so that his party had taken refuge in a small grove surrounded by cliffs.

But for Alexis it was also beneficial because it is intended that the Arabs will emerge from the forest, Alex with his army attacked them from behind the ambush. But it did not happen, the guard of Arabs, who stood on a rock, caught sight of an army of Alexei and his signaled. And Arabs in a very short time took up defensive positions. Although Alex took are not so many soldiers, but was not going to ask. He was lucky that earlier in this oasis located his reconnaissance unit, and from them he learned that the oasis is almost no water, just a rotten hole depth of approximately one and a half – two meters, so there is water.