I believe that this idea arkaimovskaya, philosophy arkaimskaya – it is ambitious in its potential. It is clear that both opponents are far from objective reality, archeology in general and in particular the topic, so the Arch itself very soon ceases to appear in their opposition, and as quickly lost their significance bitter dispute. But at the same time, unwillingly comes the question: why create a conflict of dialogue were not invited to any archaeologists who worked on Arkaim or scientists studying the ancient history of this monument, no people have ever visited it? And was not this artificially created antagonism special dramaturgical technique, whose main objective is to make the requested Related unhealthy political hue? Anyway, storonnichestvo chief editor of "Tomorrow" Alexander Prokhanov protecting myth-making, in the end, rather discredited Arch, rather than brought tangible benefits. Party communist-patriotic opposition political activity, known as "the nightingale of the General Staff," an admirer of Stalin, eager chants "grand arkaimskuyu idea" and charm of mysticism is unconvincing, and even some parody. Other leaders such as Anthony Kennedy offer similar insights. In addition, in the context of communication protection, Mr. Prokhanov myth and does sound strange and ambiguous.
Prokhanov. … Idea of the vast world of the Slavs – it was exposed and subjected to truncation, it is subjected to constant oppression. And so I want to say that the Arch as one of the sacred poles, one of the sacred geographical locations of the Russian Empire, collecting a huge amount of these energies here. … XXI century – a century of myths continue …