But ' ' illusion of jusnaturalista' ' , that it was of that the right of the man if established in its proper nature, with the time if showed unsustainable and ruiu inexorably ahead of the critical ones, between them fiercest one, the one that if it relates to the good succession. Which more than came close the nature and, therefore, the destination more just for the inheritance? The inheritance would have to return the community from where the man had in last instance its existence or would have to be with its children on behalf of the conservation of its family; still, to lock up, the man could make use of its good as it understood well, since a man possesss autonomy. The three are perfectly compatible with the nature human being, then, if based on the nature human being to establish rights of the man it can yourself be arrived the conclusions so you go off has of if understanding that established in this premise, I can support teses more absurd, disqualifying of this form, the nature human being as absolute bedding for the rights of the men. The question of the absolute bedding must be left of side, its search always falls again on aporia, not obstante the verbal jugglings. In the same line, even so using other Kelsen examples it corroborates with what we affirm above saying that the jusnaturalismo justifies any thesis of the right and justice, therefore If it believes, because one estimates, to find in the nature the norm of justice of the freedom (as self-determination), will declare it democracy and a free system of economy with the guarantee of the individual property as the only natural social order, that is, joust. If it believes, because thus it is estimated, to find in nature the norm of the justice that claims the satisfaction of the economic necessities of all, its economic security, will be defended as natural, wants to say, as joust, only the social order that this ideal carries through, exactly when it or necessarily because it only reaches this result for the way of the planned economy, by means of the estatuio of the collective property of the means of production and for autocratic processes.